24th of June, 2013, Tbilisi
I,  Maia Mtsariashvili, the prosecutor of Tbilisi,  have considered the Criminal Law Case № 074261112802, on the fact of torture and abusing the power of the coworkers of the Constitutional Security Department of  the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Georgia, the crime is regarded by the Codex of Criminal Law of Georgia, Article 1441, Subparagraphs “A”, “B”, “D” of the second part, Article 333, Subparagraphs “B” and “G” of the third part.  I took into consideration, that the evidences collected for this case, give us enough basis for supposing , that Ivane Merabishvili (the son of Sergo), born on 15th of April, 1968,  ID number 01021004498, having the state’s political position, committed the abusing of power. Ivane Merabishvili has been the Minister of Interior Affairs of Georgia since 18th of December, 2004, till 4th of July, 2012 and according to the Georgian Law about “ Public Service” , article 1, subparagraph “G” of the third paragraph, he represented the State’s Political Official. He, as Minister of the Interior Affairs, was responsible for the provision of human rights and protection of freedom, guaranteed by the Constitution of Georgia.

Tamar Merabishvili (Salakaia)- the wife of Ivane Merabishvili, the Minister of Interior Affairs of Georgia, Davit Akhalaia – the Head of the Constitutional Security Department of the Ministry of the Interior, Oleg Melnikovi- the operative coworker of this department, Vasil Sanodze- the Head of the General Inspectorate of the Ministry of the Interior, Guram Donadze- the Head of  Spokesperson Service of the Ministry of Interior Affairs, Ana Kalandadze and her friend Tatia Maisuradze gathered in Café Bar “ Chardin”, on 27th of January, 2006, at 23:00, in Tbilisi.

Later Sandro Girgvliani and his friend Levan Bukhaidze arrived at this café.  As entering the hall, Sandro Girgvliani noticed Tatia Maisuradze, as he had a close relationship to her and he even had a telephone conversation with her before arriving at the café, approached to her, and
in front of the presence of the members of the table, he began speaking with sharp gestures and loud tone, concerned the recent telephone conversation, when Tatia Maisurade hid the fact that she was at the café “Chardin”, she lied that she was at the other bar, with her female friends.
The dispute between S. Girgvliani and T. Maisuradze was noticed by Zaal Kurtsikashvili, the friend of S. Girgvliani, who tried to take Sandro Girgvliani away from the table of T. Merabishvili,  the wife of the Minister of Interior Affairs, for avoiding the possible troubles. Though Sandro Girgvliani continued speaking out the reprimands. Zaal Kurtsikashvili gave him even few remarks and invoked him to calm down.  Later, T. Maisuradze sat at the table of Sandro Girgvliani, where the conversation continued again in the background of sharp gestures.   At the process of ascertaining relationships between each-other, Sandro Girgvliani referred with obscene words one of the   official of the Minister of Interior Affairs, sitting at the table of the wife of the minister.
The tense conversation between Sandro Girgvliani and T. Maisuradze and the claims addressed to them was noticed by the members of the table of T. Maisuradze, which was confirmed by the first collect of the coworkers of Constitutional Security Department in the territory of “ Chardin Bar”.  Particularly, with the instructions of Data Akhalaia, who was sitting at the table, the coworkers of Constitutional Security Department Geronti Alania, Avtandil Aftsiauri,Aleksandre Ghachava, Mikheil Bibiluridze, Davit Kokiashvili, Ioseb Khasaia, Valerian Matreveli and others were deployed in the surrounding areas of the Liberty Square and Leselidze street in order to revenge on Sandro Girgvliani.

Sandro Girgvliani and his friend left the bar and went out after some period of time.  They were followed by O. Melnikovi, one of the members of the table of the wife of the minister, with the instructions of D.Akhalaia  in order to point at the victim for the coworkers of Constitutional Security Department. With the reference by O. Melnikovi, G. Alania, Al. Ghachava and D. Kokiashvili, got Sandro Girgvliani and his friend with force in the car and kidnapped them to the countryside 6 kilometers far from Tbilisi, to the cemetery of Okrokana. Here A. Aftsiauri and M. Bibiluri joined them. The kidnappers striped S. Girgvliani and his friend in the strong frost and beat them severely.

In order to torture Sandro Girgvliani, they wounded him countless with a knife in the different parts of the body, including 12 wounds in the area of throat. Besides the injuries were seen on the left arm,  on the left forearm, on the right arm, on the fingers, on the abdomen, on both knees, on the shin, on the hips, on the forehead, on the nose and around the eyes and late at night,  being in such helpless state, he was abandoned in this savage place.  On 28th of January, 2006, at about 15:00 the corpse of Sandro Girgvliani was found on the cemetery of Okrokana by his friends. Most of the wounds were in the area of the throat of Sandro Girgvliani, the deep wound on the larynx was fatal for Sandro Girgvliani.
Concerning L. Bukhaidze, the kidnappers left him on the cemetery in the state of beaten and nude, he escaped from the place and reached to the nearest petrol station and contactted with  police.
Ivane Merabishvili is accused because he acted against the responsibilities and civil interests, for giving illegal advantages to him and his wife as well as to the high-ranking officials subordinated to him for personal motivation, he violated the international obligations of Georgia, the Constitution of Georgia, the current legislation and by abusing his official position, ( which were determined not only by the formal-legal powers of his political position, but also the authoritative and factual  abilities of being the minister of Interior Affairs) in the way of illegal interference and with the communion intention, he influenced the  criminal law case, in biased, incomplete, and unfair legal proceedings to ensure the procedure of life and liberty infringement of Sandro Girgvliani, than in the whole period of being sentenced, for the improper implement of a verdict, and for establishing illegal benefits and conditions for accused people, also for their early releasing from the prison.

 

As the results of the acts committed by Ivane Merabishvili, premeditated all people acting in the criminal were not belied charged in criminal responsibilities in the case  of  Sandro Girgvliani, and in the case of individuals who have been convicted under the law, the law case was not relevant, which caused the illegal and unproved decisions of these people and  the improper execution of the sentence by the side of the court, which caused the violations of legal interests of the state.
The commitments by Iv. Merabishvili are expressed in follows:
Ivane Merabishvili, the ex-minister of Interior Affairs of Georgia, on 28th of February, 2006, in the Parliament of Georgia, concerning the case of Sandro Girgvliani officially announced: “ I am  deeply convinced that this case will be investigated in the near future, and the performers of this horrific murder will be known for the public”. On 26th of March, 2006, at the briefing being held in the Ministry of Interior Affairs of, Ivane Merabishvili officially announced again, that the opening of the murder of S. Girgvliani was the prestige of his and the Ministry of Interior Affair, due to this, he insisted the case to be investigated and opened by the Institution subordinated to him (The Ministry of Interior Affairs of Georgia).
In reality, Iaven Merabishvili, for the purposes of evading his political/ official responsibilities, with Davit Akhalaia, the ex-head of the Constitutional Security Department and other officials, by the personal motivation planned and performed the deliberately intended covering, changing and the circumstances existed about the case of life and freedom of Sandro Girgvliani.  He tried to attach this procedurally so, that it caused avoidance of inevitable, legal, and adequate criminal law responsibilities of the people who have ordered and co-executors. The simulation of the investigation against the commitment of S. Girgvliani was performed by the concerted action of Iv. Merabishvili and other officials. On the first hand, its aim was to hide the higher criminal officials, existed in their apply, the wife of the minister of Interior Affairs and on the second hand, they wangled to sentence A. Aftsiauri, Al. Ghachava, M. Bibiluridze for a lighter crime. Terms and conditions of the sentence previously promised and guaranteed.
The Human Rights Strasbourg Court, on 26th of April, 2011, “Against the case of Enukidze and Girgvliani” stated, that in the case of Aleksandere (Sandro) Girgvliani, there existed violations of the European Convention of Human Rights, Article 2.
The current crime investigation ascertained that, near the cemetery of Okrokana, on the second or third day after the discovering of the corpse os Sandro Girgvliani, the former head of the main division of the Ministry of Interior Affairs, Merab Baghaturia, reported directly to Iv. Merabishvili the circumstances of the crime against S. Girgvliani, ascertained by the Tbilisi Criminal Services.  Particularly that S. Girgvliani had a conflict at the “ Chardin Bar” with D. Akhalaia, the Head of Constitutional Security Department, G. Donadze- the head of the spokesperson of MIA and with other members of the table, for this reason, the coworkers of Constitutional Security Department kidnapped S. Girgvliani and his friend L. Bukhaidze.

It was reported to Iv. Merabishvili that the investigation has taken the phone records, where proves the presence of the coworkers of Constitutional Security Department in the crime place, on the cemetery of Okrokana. Also the car was detected („Mercedes - ML“), which was used for committing the crime.  The car in question belonged to G. Alania, the head of the first division of the Constitutional Security Department. Iv. Merabishvili was also told that at the “Chardin Bar” among the members of the table, there was his wife, Tamar Merabishvili. During speaking with minister it became clear for M. Baghaturia, that Iv. Merabishvili had already known the sircumstances existed in this case and this was not news for him. The head of the Main Police Division of Tbilisi required consent from Iv. Merabishvili to imprison the coworkers of the Constitutional Security Department, whose commitment on the cemetery of Okrokana was detected by the evidences existed in his hands. Though, M. Baghaturia has not received such consent from Iv. Merabishvili, despite their several meetings.

After the second or third day of the commitment, Nino Burjanadze, the former Chairman of the Parliament of Georgia invited Iv. Merabishvili to her place and required the imprisonment of the people who committed the crime, including D. Akhalaia, the Head of the Constitutional Security Department. Iv. Merabishvili, who had the whole information against the case of Sandro Girgvliani, did not accept to the requirement of the Chairman of Parliament- about the imprisonment of all guilty people, in the motivation that in this case he also had to share the political responsibilities, i.e. resigning from the position of the  ministry of the Interior Affairs.
After a few days since the funeral of S. Girgvliani there was again a meeting between Iv. Merabishvili and M. Baghaturia, besides them, the meeting was attended by D. Akalaia, and V. Sanodze. During the conversation, at the question concerning the investigation of Sandro Girgvliani, D. Akhalaia replied that everything was fine. On the other hand, M. Baghaturia said to Iv. Merabishvili, that the investigation has already looked for the person, who was at the “Chardin Bar” during this incident, and who testified the existed conflict between S. Girgvliani, and the coworkers of MIA. The witness confirms the information, that he came up to S. Girgvliani and took away from the table of D. Akhalaia and the wife of the minister, he tried to eliminate conflict between them. The received information irritated the minister and he required the explanation from D. Akhalaia. The problem to develop the investigation in their interests, was the testify of Zaal Kurtsikashvili, who was the witness of the incident between the tables of S. Girgvliani and D. Akhalaia. Revealing this fact was not in the interests of Iv. Merabishvili.

So, it is stated by the investigation, that in fact, after the second day of the commitment against Sandro Girgvliani, Ivane Merabishvili knew that (1) The Head of the Constitutional Security Department and other coworkers of the Ministry were figuring in the commitment;  (2) The crime was preceded by the presence of S. Girgvliani and his friend L. Bukhaidze at the                 “ Chardin Bar”,  where were coworkers subordinated to Iv. Merabishvili and also his wife- Tamar Merabishvili; (3) with the high degree of probability, Tamar Merabishvili was at the        “ Chardin Bar” and was one of the most informed figurant of the case happened on the cemetery of Okrokana- minimum- a witness.

(4)  The incident occurred betweent S. Girgvliani and other members of this table, which after became the reason of the cruel unheard revenge on S. Girgvliani; (5) D. Akalaia represented the initiator  in  the crime against S. Girgvliani; (6) In the simulation of this crime took place more than 4 people and all of the people were the officers of the Ministry of Interior Affairs.
With the above mentioned, Iv. Merabishvili also knew, that the Police officers of the operational units and Investigative Services ( who also investigated the crime) knew the circumstances about this crime. Due to this fact he with D. Akhalaia, together, were looking for the ways to hide the crime and to open it incompletely in the ways of “internally”.
It is stated by the investigation, during the imprisonment of the accused in the crime of force and prevention of freedom of S. Girgvliani, many falsifications and violations were intentionally committed, which meant the not implementing the justice in this case, which was finally succeeded.
Despite the fact that Iv. Merabishvili knew the main figurants in this case were the coworkers of his institution, including high officials, and the main figurant of the case was his wife Tamar Merabishvili, against the responsibilities of working duties and completely investigation the crime, he “investigated” the crime for 37 days via the investigational division subordinated to him to happen this testify in the institution subordinated to him  and  being under his control because he had the intention to testify all of the important figurants of this case, including his wife.
On 16th February, 2006, the investigator of the department of the criminal law investigation of Tbilisi main division of the MIA with the major undersecretary of this division, as they were ordered, appeared to the cabinet of Vasil Sanodze, the General Inspection of MIA- who was also one of the main figurants of this case. The testify of V. Sanodze, T. Merabishvili, D. Akhalaia, V. Melnikovi, G. Donadze, T. Maisuradze and A. Kal;andadze happened in the working cabinet of V. Sanodze, via the joint participation of all the people mentioned above and in the background of instructions and corrections of Tamar Merabishvili. The interrogation was conducted in the presence of each other and the merging of their positions and phrases, which was remarked dumbly by the investigator and who was supervised by the undersecretary of the investigation division, being nearby.

It is stated by the current investigation that Zakaria Kurtsikishvili the witness of the incident having been occurred at the “Chardin Bar” was detected in a short period of time. He met many times to the investigator of the case, who testified him as a witness. The identity and testify of Zakaria Kurtsikashvili were reported to Iv. Merabishvili ate the meeting. Though, the testify of Z. Kurtsikashvili does not exist in the investigated materials being investigated by the Division of Ministry of Interior Affairs, also his next testify at the Prosecutor’s Office did not happen on the stage of investigation. Against the explanation given by this person, the investigation conducted with such version, as if at the table there was not any incident between S. Girgvliani,  D. Akhalaia and the wife of the minister of Internal Affairs.

So, Iv. Merabishvili gave the case to the Prosecutor’s Office after the Investigation Divisions subordinated to him, have fixed procedurally the testifies of witnesses, being also in his interests, and other investigational actions, which served to keep the wife of the minister of Interior Affairs away from the case and, consequently, not existence of the presence table members on the cemetery of Okrokana. Consequently, the contents of the testifies of D. Akhalaia, G. Donadze, O. Melnikovi da V. Sanodze were preserved in this way at the Prosecutor’s Office and during the case.
It is detected by the investigation that on the crime of the case of S. Girgvliani, many procedural documents and important evidences for the case were detected on the stage of investigation, which would prove the crime against S. Girgvliani and the fact that the members of the table of the wife of Iv. Merabishvili were taking part in this crime. On the initial stage of the investigation about 10 detailed recordings were detected from the operative nets, where only two ( S. Girgvliani and G. Alania) remained, the others were soon removed from the case.

It is also detected by the investigation that the manufacturer investigator, the criminal law case against S. Girgvliani, left to the cabinet of G. Ghviniashvili, the former Prosecutor of Tbilisi for his request and for appropriate appeals, on 5th March, 2006. Afterwards the appeal text mentioned above was changed by other appeal letter because at the time of transferring S. Girgvliani’s case to G. Ghviniashvili, the case included three laser discs: The data of “Magti” tower, the data of “Geocell” tower and the recording by video form the house of B. Patarkatsishvili, where was reflected the motion of accused people towards Okrokana and back. The disc included recordings from 02:00 am till 03:00 am. The today’s appeal existing in the case does not include the instructions on this appendix anymore and, consequently, the recording involved in the case is only 34 seconds.
For the high interest of society about this case and despite special efforts, it was not provided to hide completely the presence of high officials and the wife of the minister of Interior Affairs at the “Chardin Bar” and participating the coworkers of Constitutional Security Department in this crime. Iv. Merabishvili had to announce the “detect” of the crime after a month of the committing it,  allegedly with the “special effort” of D. Akhalaia, the Head of the Constitutional Security Department.
On 6th March, 2006, he officially announced that for the death result of damaging the health of S. Girgvliani ( Criminal Law of Georgia, article 119) and for preventing freedom illegally ( Criminal Law of Georgia, article 143, subparagraphs “A”, “G” , and “T” of the second part), the following coworkers of Constitutional Security Department were accused: Geronti Alania ( The head of the first division of Constitutional Security Department), Aleksandre Ghachava ( the senior operative coworker of the first division of Constitutional Security Department), Mikheil Bibiluridze (the senior operative coworker of the first division of Constitutional Security Department), and Avtandil Aftsiauri (the senior operative coworker of the first division of Constitutional Security Department). But the arrest day, conditions, the type of punishment and the size were beforehand dealt with the accused people. According to the deal, the term of imprisonment would not be more than a year and half for each person. The accused people examined “Chardin Bar’ and the areas of Okrokana cemetery and elaboration – reconciling of the investigation version.

It is detected by the current investigation that the committed people in the case of S. Girgvliani G. Alania, M. Bibiluridze, Al. Ghachava, and A. Aftsiauri  were offered to pay 100 000 USD for each person for imprisonment and not to reveal the secret D. Akhalaia as an organizer and other officials ,and  also for silence. They also offered to provide their families’ welfare and using of many privileges during the imprisonment. On the initial stage of the investigation, Iv. Merabishvili met to the accused people and promised that “he would make his job on his own and they would not have any problems”, which he has done. Iv. Merabishvili announced their support at the meeting with accused people in the building of “Moduli”.  The part of the promised money was transferred to them by “the chief”  ( The Minister of Interior Affairs is mentioned) as a “present” and transferring the rest money was gradually during their imprisonment  ( N7 and N10 institution).
It is detected by the investigation that it was beforehand known for the accused people the investigators would provide their testifies and versions. The investigator was dictating the testifies to the accused people or they brought to them the texts being recorded beforehand, which were formally rewritten by the accused people.
It is detected by the investigation that on 3rd May, 2006, the accused people were fictitious offered procedural agreements as if the reveal of the high officials in the crime, in terms of their conditional sentence and the document of this offer was included in their cases of criminal law.  In reality, by the not acceptance of the accused people, they created a document, which assessed the evidence that the higher officials of the Ministry of Interior Affairs were not involved in this criminal  and the investigation made every effort in order to detect it. It is also detected by the current investigation that the defendants accepted a plea bargain offer from the insurance risk by D. Akhalaia. He transferred the money to the three remained people via G. Alania, as soon as one of the defendant had a wish to corporate with the investigators.
To hide the participation of D. Akalaia in this case and vice versus to show his contribution in the revealing of the case, so called “ Secret” letters were completed in the frame of falcificaion plan: the “secret” letter of D. Akhalaia, dated on 24th February, 2006 to Iv. Merabishvili N16/27. On the other hand the “secret” letter of Iv. Merabishvili dated also on 24th February, 2006 N 16/12(2) to the former general prosecutor- Z. Adeishvili. With this mentioned “secret” letter D. Akhalaia reports Iv. Merabishvili – as if the last’s task of execution process, which was about the allegedly operative-investigational measures for detecting the circumstances of the murder of S. Girgvliani. The letter transferred to Iv. Merabishvili, D. Akhalaia “detects” that with the operative data existing in his hands, in the criminal case of the death of S. Girgvliani, participated only G. Alania, M. Bibiluridze, A. Aftsiauri, and Al. Ghachava. Consequently the letter was allegedly transferred to Z. Adeishvili, the general Prosecutor of Georgia, in order to report him that in the criminal case of S. Girgvliani were figuring the coworkers of Constitutional Security Department. For the proper reaction of Z. Adeishvili, with this letter in question Iv. Merabishvili sent secret messages to D. Akhalaia, the former Head of the Constitutional Security Department.
It is detected by the current investigation, that the “ secret” letters mentioned above, are not created at the mentioned time, but was created later, in the frame of the simulation of the investigation, and represents the false documents with nonexisting contact information.
According to the Article 2 of the European Convention about “ the Humanal ’s Fundamental Rights and Freedom”, Iv. Merabishvili had the responsibility to investigate the crime in the independently, impartially and effective ways despite his own interests in the investigation. Any omission in the investigation, which interferes his abilities to detect the circumstances of the case or the accused, is pointing at the non effectiveness of the degree. ( See “Enukidze and Girgvliani against Georgia, N 25091/07, par., 242, 26th April, 2011). The case manufacturers on S. Girgvliani’s case were not independent and impartial on  the any stage of the investigation. They were depended not only hierarchical and institutional levels, but also practical and factual views on the people, who were interested not to implement the case legally due to their targets.

With the verdict of the Municipal Court of Tbilisi, 6th July, 2006, G. Alania, Al. Ghachava, M. Bibiluridze and A. Aftsiauri were imprisoned in the N10 Corrections Department of Tbilisi on 18th July, 2006. It is detected by the current investigation that according to the beforehand promises, before the imprisonment, independent residential property (the ex medical centre) was decorated for them, in order to be isolated from the other territory of the Department, fenced the outside perimeter,  A separate bathrooms, kitchen and other facilities were decorated for them. New furniture and other household appliances were put to their residence, the Internet, Cable TV and other independent lines of electricity were also installed. The routine and the behavior rules of accused were not spread on these prisoners. They walked unlimitedly on the whole territory of the Department , entered the Administrative Corpus, were talking unlimitedly on the mobile phones, at any time of the day they had the right to have guests with indefinite time and amount, who were mainly the coworkers of Interior Affairs, Department of Corrections, and Ministry of Justice, regaled them with alcohol drinks and were available to have a sexual service.
It is detected by the current investigation that G. Alania, A. Ghachava, M. Bibiluridze and A. Aftsiauri were regularly taken from the Correction Department N10 with various period of time and were driving with the cars belonged to their private service, including to the condolecens of grandmother, cousin, went shopping and etc in Tbilisi, as well as outside of it. It is also detected that, on the famous events of Russia- Georgia, 0n 11th August, 2008, G. Alania, Al. Ghachava, A. Aftsiauri,  and M. Bibiluridze were taken out of the Department of Corrections by the intention of the amnesty of the President. But D. Akhalaia had to bring them back because the  amnesty of the President temporary was put off. Later, on 24th November, 2008, G. Alania, Al. Ghachava, A. Aftsiauri,  and M. Bibiluridze were really pardoned by the President of Georgia.
The Human Rights European Court points that the state must show more severity during the punishment of the representatives of justice structure, than during other accused people because in this time, not only the accused people’s individual responsibilities of Criminal Law are under the risk , but also the liability of the state- eliminate the impunity, which might be were during the working in the justice structures ( See Nikolova and Velichkova N63)

 “When the person dies in doubtful circumstances and in the hands of officials, at the beginning of the investigation, the inner state institutions should be more careful. In other case, the state will reveal the tolerant attitude to the acts being harmful for the life, it will stand in front of non accusation of sense of developing risks, which may be open the ways for other imprudent criminals, such as it was given in this case” ( Enukidze and Girgvliani against Georgia, paragraph 277).
Iv. Merabishvili not only violated the liability of the state to reveal the illegal  privilege of impunity between the coworkers of the Ministry of Interior Affairs, but he caused with his act, the direct promotions of the accused  people being subordinated to his service by personal motivations against the interests of  public and other entities. The criminal act of Iv. Merabishvili, was shown in the hiding of criminal and accused people, in implementing various actions and plans, in the simulation of investigation and organizing the falsification, in the false expectance of the criminal- in the misleading of the public, in supporting morally and materially  of the criminals, in the creating illegal condition privileges for them being imprisoned, and instead of silence the offer of welfare and fee, also in providing of releasing from the imprisonment earlier than the time.

So, Ivane Merabishvili committed a crime foreseen by the Criminal Law of Georgia, Article 332, Part 2 , which means abusing the power, being performed by the state- political official.
About the committed crime of Iv. Merabishvili the enough ground for the proved suppose give the combinations of the proofs- the testifies of the witnesses: Nino Burjanadze, Merab Baghaturia, davit Kupatadze, Emzar Gharibashvili, Dimitri Bichinashvili, tamaz Vasadze, Dimitri Shaorshadze, Jemal Gabelia, Malkhaz Bokhua, Ivane Kiknavelidze, Tamaz Vasadze, Giorgi Tsnobiladze, Shalva Nikabidze, Davit Sarjveladze, Vazha Gamezardashvili, Gia Kobachishvili, Leri Tsereteli, Tengiz Chitiashvili, Badri Goglidze, Gela Lazashvili, Shota Gengashvili, Nodar Narsaia, Zaza Kimadze, Zaza Osiashvili, Tamar Mikadze, Ioseb Tbelashvili, Datuna Gafrindashvili, Vakhtang Imedashvili, Gela Asanishvili, Tamaz Mazanashvili, Vasil Sanodze, Gurgen Donadze, Konstantine Archaia, Zurab Kotaria, Shalva Vashakidze,Mamuka Sabanadze, Zaza Kurtsikashvili, Levan Chifashvili, Ioseb Khasaia, Marina Manukiani, Rusudan Archvadze, Ioseb Sadradze, Davit Javakhishvili,  Lasha Merebashvili,   Davit Chkhartashvili,  Aleksandre Mgeladze,  Valeri Latsuzbaia,  Zviad Guguchia,  Varlam Khetsuriani,  Lasha amiranashvili,  Salome Januashvili,  Temur Tabaghua,  Murad Gabunia,  Ramaz Chokhonelidze,  MIndia Jakhaia,  Kakha Gazdeliani, Ivane Javakhi, Davit Samkharadze,  Avtandil Gularovi, Zviad Jinjolia,  Akaki Mushkudiani,  Natia Ramishvili,  Tsiala Doijashvili,  Aleksandre Dolinski,  Gia Alavidze,  Giorgi Mukhigulishvili,  Giorgi Shalamberidze,  Zurab Kvitsiani,  Vladimer Gvasalia,  Archil Arevadze,  Irakli Kiparoidze,   Nino Gvelesiani,  Aleksandre Ghachava,  Mikheil Bibiluridze,  Avtandil Aftsiauri,  Davit Kokiashvili,  Giorgi Kalandarishvili,  Nino Kikabidze,  Zurab Grigolashvili,  Tsiuri Tevdorashvili, Lamara Gabrielashvili.

By the materials of Criminal Law N10060037, by the resolution of the Municipal Court of Tbilisi, 5th September, 2009,
the order(amnesty) of the President of Georgia in 2008, N768, the reference letters of the minister of Interior Affairs 24th February, 2006 N 16/12(s) and the letter of D. Akhalaia, the Head of the Constitutional Security Department, 24th February, 2006, N16/27(s), the letters and documents transferred by the minister of Justice of Georgia 19th February, 2013 N 19632, the letter of the undersecretary of the State Security Agency, in 2013 N 16/2- 966599, the letter of the department of case manufacturing of the Ministry of Justice of Georgia, 28th February, 2013 N 23464, the claim of the Human Rights European Court on the case “ Enukidze and Girgvliani against Georgia” , 26th April, 2011, ( the complaint N 25091/07),  the documents presented by Giorgi Tsnobiladze, The protocols of  opening and examining the evidences, the extract of the electronic journal of the pass bureau in August, 2008 in the building of Constitutional Security Department of MIA (“Moduli”), the letter transferred from the Information- Analyses Services of the General Inspection of the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Georgia, on 13th April, 2013 N 695719, sent to the Administrative Building of the MIA (Street 9. April N4) with the copies of the journals of registration and entrance and exit of strange people in February,2006.  Documents taken from the Municipal Court of Tbilisi and Department of Corrections about the early release of A. Aftsiauri, G. Alania, Al.Ghachava, and M. Bibiluridzefrom the imprisonment,  the documents and the letters transferred from the chancellery of the Municipal Court of Tbilisi, 8th February, 2013, N 4558,; the documents transferred from the Finance and Administration  Department of the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Georgia 25th January, 2013 N 10/4/2-13-0 and the State Security Agency of Administration and Finance - Logistics Job, 18th January, 2013 N 101569. The detailed data about the incoming and outgoing calls from the LTD “Magti” and “Geocell”  the extracts of the telephone calls presented by Gaga Alavidze, 4th February, 2013.  the service list of Ivane Merabishvili,   and also by other evidences existing in the criminal law case and by taking into consideration the Criminal Law Procedural Codes of the articles 17, 166, 169,
I ascertained:

1. Ivane (the son of Sergo) Merabishvili must be accused according to the Criminal Law codex of Georgia, article 332, part 2.
2. The verdict about the accusation of Ivane Merabishvili should be introduced by Kakhaber Chumbadze,  the Investigator of Especially Important Cases of the Main Prosecutor’s Office of Georgia.
The Prosecutor of Tbilisi                                                                                       Maia Mtsariashvili